Alexander the Great once climbed to the top of a mountain to survey his kingdom. Standing on the peak of the mountain, he realized that his kingdom extended in every direction, as far as the eye could see. When he realized this, he broke down in tears.
“He wept with sorrow,” Plutarch said, “Because there were no more worlds to conquer.”
We are a generation without warriors.
Until the second half of the twentieth century, life for the majority of people – even in the Western world – was a battle. It was a war fought daily against the very real threat of poverty, starvation, disease, famine, plague, and war. It was a matter of survival.
HEY FAGGOTS, I'M ABEFAG AND I OWN SHIT NIT SHIZZLENITS, YOU SISSY BOY GIRLS LIKE BIG CAWKS AND I LIKE BIG BOOBYS, YOU BRING IT TO MY HOUSE I BANG IT CUS I'M LIKE THAT NIGGER HEAD MAN, YOUR VAGINA IS LIKE A radioactive dong ON DRUGS, HOW DARE YOU DARE ME TO A POKEMON MATCH ON A SUNDAY WHEN I FUCK PEOPLE.
Ok, I was thinking of the cost effective way to be free of most of societies influences.
I came up with a country house that can be built considerably less with bales of hay for walls covered by chicken wire then stacko (sand grit stuff). Chicken wire helps keep it on. Then you toss on a few resources like a cistern, gas/ethonal generator (followed by green long term solutions later).
OR, self designed and built houseboat. It is suppose to be cheaper to build than buy. Would need tools but what is new. >.> greater fantasy would be making one that can handle ocean waters then traveling abroad.
...
Internet access would be provided by a cell phone with global/country based internet connection (satelites), with a pc connected to it (as the modem).
...
What do you think?
Personally? I think we should have small independent groups, similar to tribes. Each would be a Anarcho-syndicate. One large "governed" area, which would produce armament and equipment. We should KILL each other, no rules but "No Nukes"
My political beliefs put me within the realm of agorism and anarchism without adjectives. I think any kind of economic organization could work under the right circumstances, and that the most important thing is an opposition to the state. However, I feel that the term "anarchism" is misleading to a lot of people and has negative connotations that inhibit clarity. I prefer the terms "emergentist" adn "anti-statist" and "polycentrist". What do you guys think?
For a better understanding of my thoughts, see fringeelements.ning.com.
So, what are /an/'s thoughts on Wombling up at demos? Good or bad.
GOOD: Protects you from police attacks and can be used as a "shock force" to break police lines.
BAD: Can make the demo as a whole look more threatening as confrontational, allowing the police to use more force without loosing PR.
Personally, I think wearing a helmet and arm guards/leg guards under my trousers is as far as I would go. Shields seem a bit much.
