>>178278
Yeah, MSNBC likes to play "Refute the other guys" and tends to pass themselves off more as "Intellectual" when they are about as much as jerkoffs as Faux, save they do it with a smirk and smug look.

I listen to NPR/PRI/local PBS radio/TV news and a touch of BBC, despite all the flak it gets, at least the people they bring on the shows end up coming to a "Agree to disagree" and yet still concur on certain aspects of each others viewpoints.

Supposedly, if every news channel was publicly funded, it might change the objectivity and style of their reporting. And it might get drama-fags like Beck to STFU.

>>178502

"Supposedly, if every news channel was publicly funded, it might change the objectivity and style of their reporting. And it might get drama-fags like Beck to STFU."

Beck is Beck. Just like Olbermann is Olbermann. I don't confuse them with news. They are commentary.

I'm not a fan of the idea of publicly funded news. The reason being is it will be funded at least partially by the government.

News has gone to shit over the last 20 to 25 years. I miss impartial, plain vanilla, facts only based news. I prefer to make up my own mind, right now I have to sift through a bunch of other opinions to actually get to the facts and decide where I stand.

>>178646
Look into BBC.
Goverment funded, but.....well, far from perfect.....but a much much higher standard than any of that usa shit.

>>177684
not even worth answering , completely took me out of context .
>>177705
fact is , moth wealth isn't even made honestly or independently of society , and with what this guy said it's pretty obvious that they can stand paying the taxes or break democratic conncensus and shunned , works every time they try.

>Let me ask you this: Is your life lived this way? How much of your income do you donate to charity every month? How much of your time do you spend at the soup kitchens and homeless shelters?

Charity does not have to be visible to the public, it can be private. Take what Joan Crock did for instance after her death; thousands to millions went to charities and scholarships and public institutions. That money generated, even if not hers and from the giant food empire Golden Arches was given back to the public.

At least the captains of industry of old donated money to build Opera houses and music halls to promote the arts, donated money to universities and opened scholarships, and in turn had places of work that needed people to run.

Despite robber barons and captains of industry either having a good or bad rap, you have to look at the fact of what they did with their capitol; Did they accumulate wealth and not reinvest it back in to society, or did they take that wealth and reinvest it and give it back to the public with facilities that the public can use?

In truth, it often takes a monopoly to make a successful industry, but it also takes a monopoly to establish the infrastructure for that industry to continue long after the monopoly is gone and broken up.

>>178515
That's my point. People can whine and bitch about the motives I have in life, namely making money, but they seem to think that won't help anyone else. People can bitch about wal-mart, but no one can argue that they deliver the same products as any other supermarket, just more, faster, and cheaper. No one can argue that working at wal-mart is an opportunity for HS/College kids who want some extra cash. No one can argue that without walmart, 2,100,000 people would be looking for work.

At everyone:

All you faggots that preach socialism, what do you actually do with it? Do you provide jobs with great wages and benefits? Do you donate spare time to widows and orphans? Or do you simply try to get other people to do it for you?

http://anonym.to/?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnegie_Mellon_University
http://anonym.to/?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gates_Foundation
http://anonym.to/?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_McDonald_House

tl;dr. lick ling to view the boring shit.

http://anonym.to/?http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/

Watch. Learn. Kill.

>>163003
Watch. Refute. Dismiss.

>>162603
Money, or currency, is the trust in our government giving us something of value for the amount of time we place in our works of labor. Gold is only there if we wish to invest in capitol rather than trust. Money is a form of trust, not value.

1 ounce of gold back in the time of the Romans could go out and buy you a really nice toga and sandals.

1 ounce of gold in our time will buy you a really nice suit and great shoes.

Gold has held its value, currency based off a GDP with a out of whack balance of import and export of goods has not. Printing extra has not helped.

That cop is just trying to do his job, and people want to kill him with petrol bombs.

Assholes.

>>174983

1/10

Try harder next time troll.

I'm circulating this.

I lol'd so hard.

hey it's plausible , would be awesome.
we would need to invade mekkah and see what rejuvenation secretes the monolith holds though.

stuck on your track fuckin sp

>>134851
the bible shouldn't be taught in a historical context because it's not a historical document.

And though Atheists do have their zealots, I think you would be very hard pressed to find a case of an atheist blowing himself up to kill innocents, or marrying several under-aged girls, or mutilating genitalia for their beliefs, or any other reason for that matter.

is a good tome on belief of any sort. Belief is a mind killer. You are best served when you believe in nothing. Some things are more likely than others. But nothing is inevitable, or eternal.

that religionfags have finally outbread(spelling) everyone else.

There is always a core of people who refuse to :
stop making large families
and educating their children with a way of life that supports making large families.

only "genocide" is appropriate here

if people became suddenly immortal it would be synonymous with cancer.

How's that hope and change working out for you?

>>176414

>US company owns WHO

Israelanon here again, I think ill namefag for a while , it's funny that monsanto doesn't do official business here .
I wonder why lol .

anyway they should be anhilated , I have heard about them and also have read their site.
I am radically anti IP and biological IP is the worst before even software patents.

We shouldn't give special rights of violence to those who wouldn't otherwise invent something that would be invented in our world one year later anyway , (most likely sooner if less patents hindered innovation)

wow, somebody at OPM was asleep when they did this idiots security clearance..

Good find OP.

hello americans , should we expose all your spies or that will make obama angry (and we might not want that?)?