[Home] [Archive] [Manage]
[Blackomen] [Cloudcity] [Deepblue] [Electricblue] [Germany] [Greendream] [Hell] [Lasvegas] [Marcabian] [Mesa] [Milw0rm] [Moonlight] [Quebec] [Rainbow] [Redcoat] [Redwood] [Scandinavian] [Snowyhills] [Thunderdome] [Trollshido] [Wasteland] [Wirah] [Zeal]

[Return]
Posting mode: Reply

Z103 CACAW - PREMIUM INTERNET RADIO

To listen you must install Flash Player.

Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: 7Z, FLAC, GIF, JPG, MP3, OGG, PNG, RAR, SWF, TORRENT, ZIP
  • Maximum file size allowed is 2048 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Update, June 7th: Check out the new Photography and /rage/ boards! Travel is this weeks Wildcard Board discussion.
  • Install the Wakaba Firefox Extension.
  • Read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

File: 1242138224529.jpg -( B, 768x1920) Thumbnail displayed, click the ling for full size.
No.50238  

I sent out a message to a scilon on you tube warning of the coming storm if he/she proceeds in attempting to garner support for scientology.

Youtube profile AffinityKRC sent me a message back today:

Anonymous is an insignificant group that has never posse any treat to Scientology.

In fact since the Anonymous anti-Scientology movement started Scientology has experienced the greatest expansion ever. I know that you guys are still in denial but the reality is that Anonymous is FAIL.

You say be warned. Be warned of what? A bunch of rag tag losers dress like going to a cheap Halloween party!

The reality is that Scientology has grown stronger while Anonymous has grown smaller.

Anonymous still intends to expel the influence of the fag-masters of scientology from the internet and dismantle the church of Scientology in its present form.

Yes, Anonymous said that years ago, and Scientologys influence in the net is greater that ever.

Your words Anonymous still intends is clear admission of failure.

You mean you still intend like you admit that you have FAIL the last few years.

Ridiculous!

Dont waste my time.

>> No.50267  

Still in denial. This user is afraid, which is why he/she disabled comments and rating on their videos because of people like us.

>Anonymous is an insignificant group that has never posse any treat to Scientology.

Then how come your 'church' called false terrorist threats against us?

>In fact since the Anonymous anti-Scientology movement started Scientology has experienced the greatest expansion ever. I know that you guys are still in denial but the reality is that Anonymous is FAIL.

Buying Ideal Orgs is not expansion because some of these buildings are inactive and are closed due to 'renovations' and your members have to fund money for these 'renovations'. Find out where all the money goes.

>You say be warned. Be warned of what? A bunch of rag tag losers dress like going to a cheap Halloween party!

But it's fun. Do you remember what "fun" is? Its happening while you're not around.

>The reality is that Scientology has grown stronger while Anonymous has grown smaller.

If you're talking about the activist group, perhaps. But yet your 'church' has yet to contain this problem, even if we have less members.
If you're talking about the collective, then you are wrong. Anonymous's influence on the net is still strong. WE RUN THIS.

>Anonymous still intends to expel the influence of the fag-masters of scientology from the internet and dismantle the church of Scientology in its present form.
>Yes, Anonymous said that years ago, and Scientologys influence in the net is greater that ever.

Your so-called church's YouTube channel has only a few thousands hits since its creation last year. I thought it was the fastest growing religion? Otherwise it would have had hundred of thousands of views.

>Your words Anonymous still intends is clear admission of failure.

I doubt it. I read your church's stats of from 12 months, your sales are down and people are not pay for your 50 years old "Modern Science" books. They only way they are making money is from the Ideal Orgs fund-raising for 'renovations' and the SuperPower building.

>You mean you still intend like you admit that you have FAIL the last few years.

First of all, it's FAILED, as in your education system FAILED you in teaching English grammar. Your 'church' promised its members to become super-human but instead it de-evolved them into a pack of animals. Which is why no rational human being will ever decide to join your 'church'. Let's see which one of us will outlast the other.

>> No.50313  

OP here. I sent him a second message.

Please ctrl+c --> ctrl+v and re-send.

Tell me do you enjoy spending thousands of dollars to buy tech you've already done? Do you ever feel like you're just faking the tech works, so you won't be forced to buy it again? Do you feel confused that you've gone clear, but still have problems and some health troubles? Do you wonder why the tech looks like it works for everybody else but it doesn't work for you? Do you ever feel stuck on a loop and you can't get out?

Everyone in Scientology feels that way. You can shatter the suppression of Scientology.

>> No.50340  

>>50313
nicely done.

>> No.50404  
File: 1242173271141.jpg -( B, 880x1192) Thumbnail displayed, click the ling for full size.

"Of course not!
Is a proven fact that all monies collected by Scientology are used for church activities.
No one in the CoS is getting rich.
I know because I did accounting for CoS long ago.
You will never see a church exec in a limo or massion.
I have seen the apartments of the Top execs not big.

Still Scientology is an expesive proposition because it has a ver high over head.

It takes like two years to train an auditor (at least), you need a CS, a qual, ethics, the list goes on and on. All this is expesive and ads to the overhead. And someone needs to pay for all this.

Personally I go to Mexico to get my services.
Is much cheaper.

What determines Scientology non-profit status is not how it collects money but how it spends it."

>> No.50406  

when davey boy re-organised sci in 1982 (the corporate reshuffle), he also enforced a re-distribution of wealth - upwards.

OUT were the rich mission holders

IN with "foundations" that RTC and similar funnels it's jewgolds away to. there's no money in scientology, ever

>> No.50501  

>>50406

So then...

Hubbard CoS -----$-----> World domination.

Miscavige Cos -----$-----> Davey wants diamond studded platform heels.



Delete Post []
Password