Considering the state they are in at the moment, anything like that would create a massive media shitstorm when they call the press about terrorist bigots as well as adding to the doubts that all the scifags who have been to the sekrit briefings about SP's being consolidated, which would mean moar chaos inside the cult itself.

PROLEXIC. GOOGLE IT.

>>90370

We'll just have to adapt.

As always.

>>90785

How do you intend to do that?

PROLEXIC. LOIC IT.

>>91219

Could we?

No, you can't. The prolexic servers are designed to prevent SODD attacks.

google them.

>>92066

That's why it's such a brilliant plan!

If we COULD fuck them up (would need something more sophisticated than LOIC I know) imagine the result!

Ok. You can SoDD scientology.org. Nothing on the internet is entirely SoDD proof. And yes we SoDDed scientology.org after they moved to Prolexic and took the site offline. But it was massive. With all the botnets, wget scripts, Longcat flooders, ping floods etc when still went to 4chan and had them copy the images on scientology.org and then use gigaloader to run a very low-tech bandwidth rape. So whatever would have to be massive. But think about this. It's already been done. And a year and a half ago no less. I'm not trying to discourage you but the second time you do something it isn't going to be as newbreaking because it isn't original. It would make the news, but it would be "Hackers again...." see? It wouldn't gain the momentum of the first time. It has to be something that hasn't been done.

or it has to be something that hapens every day

You have no clue how a SoDD works, do you?